A church member sent me this question:
“I have a question that has come up in our Sunday school classes and wanted a professional educator’s opinion. This past week we were studying the passage where John the Baptist baptizes Jesus and then the spirit descended upon the earth “like a dove.” Now of course, any story that I have heard says that the spirit descended and it was a dove. But one of our teachers was offended because the Bible doesn’t say it was an actual dove but “like a dove”. [My husband] and I have been having this discussion because how would you teach this story to a 1st-5th grader about an abstract thought. Would it be better to tell them it was a dove since that is very concrete or tell them about this abstract thought of the Holy Spirit?
â€The teacher’s thought was that we shouldn’t tell them one thing when they are younger and then teach them something totally different later on down the road. What is your opinion?â€
Here’s what I think. For starters, it is appropriate, and desirable, to “just tell the story” without interpretation to younger children. And it’s o.k. to be concrete—Adam and Eve were “real” persons, the Garden was a real place, there were animals on the ark, Balaam’s donkey talked, and, if you like, it was “a dove.” Children really just need the story—not our (adult) interpretation of it. Continue reading