Fix the problem

My engineer son has a mantra: “Fix the problem.” As mantras go, it’s a pretty good one. Simple, memorable, intuitive, and to the point. The mantra refers to our tendency to go about addressing issues, problems, or stuck situations by doing a lot of things none of which will actually “fix the problem.” It’s an amazing phenomenon, all the more so for how common it is. Since my son’s brain is wired in the logical-pragmatic mode of the engineer he often is amused at the non-logical way people try to solve problems.

gs104-sm.jpg

Recently, in the faculty and staff lounge of a school someone had the ability to “solve the problem.” The problem was with the coffee pot. Despite years of memos, signs, and complaints, inevitably the “last person” to use the coffee pot or leave the lounge would neglect to turn off the coffee maker (one of those “Mr. Coffee” things). (First logical problem: how do you know you’re the “last person” to leave a faculty and staff lounge?). This resulted in the roasting of the dregs in the glass coffee pot with its attending burnt-coffee smell and potential fire hazard. One clever staff member finally fixed the problem. Rather than try to change people’s behavior, trying to make them more responsible, sending out another memo, sending another e-mail reminder to the entire distribution, or putting up another sign, he got a wall outlet timer, set it to shut off automatically at the end of the day, and plugged in the coffee pot. Problem solved.

Another example is the company that needed to print new business cards for their new executive. In the midst of a budget crunch someone decided to save money by printing the business cards in-house. If you’ve ever tried to print out your own business cards using a desktop computer and printer you’ve learned that no program or printer can produce genuinelly professional looking business cards. At least three people from two different departments worked between three to four hours to produce an acceptable business card—and none of those people’s job had anything to do with producing business cards. When you add up the man-hours in salaries (3 employees x 3+ hours), lost time from other projects and the jobs those employees need to do, and wasted cardstock and printer ink, this small group managed to crank out the most expensive business cards ever—only to yield a product that communicated, “amateurs.” How to fix the problem: don’t be penny wise and pound foolish; send out an order for a professional printing job—it’s not that expensive, and a business card needs to communicate quality and professionalism. Fix the problem.

It’s an old situation

I recently came across this way of making the point for the need to “fix the problem.” You may have seen it:

The Tribal wisdom of the North American Indian, passed on from generation to generation, says that, “When you discover that you are riding a dead horse, the best strategy is to dismount.”

However, in the world of church and denominational life more advanced strategies are often employed, such as:

1. Buying a stronger whip.
2. Changing riders.
3. Appointing a committee to study the horse.
4. Arranging to visit other churches to see how other congregations and denominations ride horses.
5. Lowering the standards so that dead horses can be included.
6. Reclassifying the dead horse as living-impaired.
7. Outsourcing the issue to dead horses overseas.
8. Hiring outside denominational consultants to ride the dead horse.
9. Harnessing several dead horses together to increase speed.
10. Providing additional funding and/or training to increase dead horse’s performance.
11. Conducting a survey to see if lighter riders would improve the dead horse’s performance.
12. Declaring that as the dead horse does not have to be fed, it is less costly, carries lower overhead and therefore contributes substantially more to the bottom line of the mission and budget than do some other horses.
13. Rewriting the expected performance requirements for all horses.
14. Promoting the dead horse to a supervisory position.

Broken Sunday School?

If your Sunday School is broken, fix the problem. When it comes to Sunday School there are four aspects on which we typically overfocus:

  • The problem isn’t with the hour. 9:45 a.m. is a perfectly fine timeslot that’s been around for ages. But the problem may be that the typical Sunday School “hour” only allows for 40 minutes of actual formal Christian education. Perhaps the problem is the length of the learning experience. The ideal length of time for a process-oriented learning experience is 90 minutes. And if 9:45 is the only time you offer formal Christian education, then that’s a real problem.
  • The problem isn’t that you have non-professional “lay” teachers. The problem is probably that your church provides little to no regularly scheduled, on-going, formal training to help them be effective, knowledgeable skilled teachers.
  • The problem isn’t with the curricular resource material you use (they’re all basically the same). The problem is probably that an instructional approach is just not effective when it comes to helping people grow in faith. When it comes to educating people in faith, they need a different way than what the limitations of instruction can provide.
  • The problem isn’t that “only” one-fourth of your active church membership shows up for Sunday School. The problem is probably that you’re focusing on the wrong issue. First, adding more people to attend a broken program doesn’t fix the problem. Second, numbers are not an indicator of educational effectiveness (meaning, you’re assessing the wrong variable and attributing to attendance a meaning it does not warrent). Third, focusing on getting more people to come to Sunday School tends to make us miss the needs of those persons and groups for whom Sunday School, as a program and way of learning, cannot satisfy. The fact is that if Sunday School is the only, or primary, educational enterprise your church offers, then you’re not meeting the needs of some of the members of your church who need different ways and emphases to help them grow in faith.

galindobanner3.jpg

About igalindo

Israel Galindo is Professor and Associate Dean for Lifelong Learning at Columbia Theological Seminary.
This entry was posted in curriculum, Sunday school. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Fix the problem

  1. Church professionals and other church leaders spend a lot of time doing the equivalent of printing out business cards (and sometime even literally doing that). Sometimes the “dead horse” is ourselves and the way we function in our jobs (paid or volunteer). Fortunately, we can be revived if we are motivated. Getting clear on our own job, our purpose and goals will help.

  2. Robert D. says:

    An excellent blog entry. I will add that within the context of volunteerism and church programs I point a television show I once remember seeing about the way Russia used to find and train fighter pilots. They would take large numbers of men and put them through their fighter pilot training program which consisted of various mental, visual and physical trials. The important thing was they didn’t prepare these candidates for what they should expect, or how to “pass” or any of the trials. Those that were naturally predisposed to being fighter pilots passed the trials using gut-instinct and logic. Those who washed out were deemed unworthy of spending millions of rubles on, to obtain what would have been a mediocre fighter pilot at best.

    To further illustrate my point, in the context of church volunteerism and church programs, maybe churches shouldn’t look for people to “train” to do a job. Figure out what gifts people already have and build on them. I for one could not see myself teaching Sunday school, but I can most certainly help out running, repairing and consulting on church information technology, and more importantly, I’m happy and enthusiastic about doing it.

    In that way, seeing that I’m worth something to the church and my gifts are appreciated I begin to build a sense of community and belonging which is a critical element and an excellent stepping stone to help with other church needs because I’m now filled with the volunteer / servant spirit and may even begin to see some of the hidden rewards of being part of the church community. Once you have someone’s heart you can ask more of them and they will likely (and probably happily) respond.

    Additionally, sometimes people that volunteer to head a church program are not worth investing the training in due to the fact that they just don’t fit. Dr. Galindo is a proponent of various systems for determining what people are meant to do, be, and are in life. Why don’t churches employ these tools to strengthen leadership in areas where it’s needed? When a person has a gift that is congruent with a church need it’s amazing how much energy and enthusiasm they will bring to the table.

Comments are closed.