{"id":958,"date":"2008-05-28T00:05:31","date_gmt":"2008-05-28T04:05:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/?p=958"},"modified":"2008-05-24T14:18:58","modified_gmt":"2008-05-24T18:18:58","slug":"imaginative-gridlock","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/archives\/958","title":{"rendered":"Imaginative Gridlock"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I\u2019ve been working with a couple of organizations that are \u201cstuck\u201d but motivated enough to get moving toward becoming \u201chealthier.\u201d As I witness the process of working with the leaders and employees of both organizations I\u2019m reminded of some fundamental truths about systems. First, while motivation is a necessary component for bringing about change, it\u2019s not sufficient. For example, if the motivation is to simply ease acute anxiety or pain a system will settle on pragmatic \u201cinstant\u201d solutions that will ease the symptoms.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>But once the pain (the symptom) eases, the temptation is to ignore working on the fundamental issues that will move the system toward health. That\u2019s logical since working toward health often brings about more, or different, \u201cpain.\u201d Any system that lacks tolerance for pain will always settle on being medicated rather than go the \u201cno pain, no gain\u201d route. <\/p>\n<p>Second, the role and the function of the leader is key. I\u2019ve witnessed two common leadership liabilities in these organizations. In one, the leader has a pattern of \u201cadapting to weakness.\u201d Specifically, rather than moving toward the most mature persons in the system and inviting their input and giving them permission to act, the leader tends to give over-attention to the most fearful, anxious, and needy in the system. In this case, a group of persons who are self-identified \u201cvictims\u201d seeking \u201cprotection\u201d and \u201cprivileges.\u201d The natural tendency of this group to \u201cherd\u201d and \u201cglum together\u201d is perceived by the leader as a \u201cvoting block,\u201d when in fact, it is the leader\u2019s cuddling and over-attention to the \u201cneeds\u201d and feelings of this group that empowers them.<\/p>\n<p>In the other, the leader lacks an appreciation for the tenacity of the destructive forces in the system, and fails to appreciate the necessary corrective function that the leader must provide, namely, to inhibit those forces\u2019 capacity to sabotage progress toward a vision. Admittedly this is tough since those \u201cforces\u201d often are manifested as personalities in the organization. <\/p>\n<p>Third, both organizations exhibit what Edwin H. Friedman called \u201cImaginative Gridlock.\u201d Friedman identified three characteristics of imaginative gridlock:<\/p>\n<p><strong>The Treadmill Effect. <\/strong>Both organizations are very busy doing the same things and following the same procedures they\u2019ve been doing for years, and which has gotten then stuck. Yet they seem to have an inability to get off the treadmill. Breaking patterns of behaviors and practice is proving to be a huge challenge to both organizations. It seems it\u2019s just easier to run in place and get nowhere than to get off the treadmill, change their ways, and make progress.<\/p>\n<p><strong>A focus on answers.<\/strong> It\u2019s always amazing how quickly the call for answers comes when acute anxiety is present. In one organization this happened in the first meeting! They weren\u2019t interested in exploring what \u201cthe problem\u201d may be or what their part in it was. They wanted to know not only what I was going to do, but how I was going to do whatever it was that would help them get out of their stuckness (I jokingly had to remind them that a consultant doesn\u2019t actually \u201cdo\u201d anything). <\/p>\n<p>In the second organization one person kept pushing for \u201cdata.\u201d That\u2019s a sure sign of imaginative gridlock: an inability to move toward adventure, vision, and imagination rather than a search for certitude. When certitude is your highest value, boldness goes out the window as a resource. The fact is that innovators, visionaries, and trendsetters don\u2019t work off of \u201cdata.\u201d They move on imagination fueled by vision.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The polarization of false dichotomies.<\/strong> The third characteristic of imaginative gridlock is \u201ceither-or thinking.\u201d When the mind is anxious it cannot be imaginative. It tends, therefore, to create false dichotomies and to polarize concepts, options, and opinions. And then it doesn\u2019t take long to begin labeling and personalizing issues, leading to an inability to listen and dialogue. In one organization the result has been the formation of \u201cfactions\u201d or \u201ccamps.\u201d Once someone became identified in a \u201ccamp\u201d his or her opinions and thoughts were always discounted by another faction\u2014regardless of the merit of the content. <\/p>\n<p>Change comes hard to organizations, but even harder to systems that suffer from imaginative gridlock. In these cases it\u2019s necessary to focus on changing the way the culture thinks first, and then work on change. As Einstein said, \u201cProblems cannot be solved at the same level of awareness that created them.\u201d <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.galindoconsultants.com\"><img src='http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/11\/galindobanner5.jpg' alt='galindoconsultants.com' \/><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I\u2019ve been working with a couple of organizations that are \u201cstuck\u201d but motivated enough to get moving toward becoming \u201chealthier.\u201d As I witness the process of working with the leaders and employees of both organizations I\u2019m reminded of some fundamental &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/archives\/958\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[18,37,22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-958","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bowen-family-systems-theory","category-congregational-life","category-leadership"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/958","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=958"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/958\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=958"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=958"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/grace-ed.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=958"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}