The Hawthorne effect

Yesterday I heard President-elect Obama speak at a news conference where he introduced the new education secretary, Arne Duncan, head of the Chicago school system. One point Obama stressed was that we needed to increase our expectations about student performance. I agree wholeheartedly.

I remember a playful experiment using the Hawthorne effect I conducted when I was a school principle. There was a kindergarten teacher that I thought would make a great first grade teacher. She was reluctant to move from her K-5 class to first grade. First grade is a critical grade for children and there is a high level of expectation on results. First graders need to end the year as strong readers. That’s critical for their success for the rest of their academic career.

As a last resort I tapped into the Hawthorne effect as a motivator to get the teacher to sign on to first grade. I told her that we would create an “advanced first grade class.” We would identify the brightest students in the kindergarten classes and shepherd them into an advanced first grade class, and she would be the teacher. I explained that while this was an experiment I had high expectations of this class, that they would be super-performers. The teacher jumped at the challenge, as any good teacher would.

Needless to say, near the end of the school year, when the standardized test scores came back, her class significantly outscored the other five first grade classes. Not a small feat given that the rest of the first grade classes all scored one to two grade levels above the national norm as it was. The funny thing, of course, was that there really was not “advanced” placement done by administration. We didn’t hand pick any of the students in her class. They were just regular students who came from all of last year’s kindergarten classes.

What made the difference? High expectations and the Hawthorne effect. The teacher was motivated and had high expectations of her (“advanced”) students. She proudly told her students that they were the “advanced” first grade class, that they were smart, and that they could do great work. Predictably, the students stepped up to her expectations.

In my experience the Hawthorne effect has universal application. It does not only work with gullible students. Tell a sports team that they are a select team and their performance kicks up to a higher level. Pull a team of workers together and tell them they were selected because of their ability to perform at a high level and they’ll start there. Tell an under-performer “I expect better of you,” and most will start performing better. Tell a graduate student “You can do better,” and more often than not, they will.

I also found that when the leader sets expectations for higher standards you can count on two things: (1) the best people in the organization step up to the challenge and perform better, and (2) the slackers start leaving the system.

galindoconsultants.com

POST SUMMARY
Date posted: Wednesday, December 17th, 2008 12:58 am | Under category: children, curriculum, teaching
RSS 2.0 | Comment | Trackback
» 3 Comments

3 Comments

  1. mike harton said »

    Truly a proven cause and effect relationship. I also find it interesting, as a total aside, your making this connection between Obama’s comments and the location at which they were made: Chicago–the location (or close) of the Hawthrone Plant where the original experiment was conducted. Perhaps Obama was aware of this as he set the expectations for his education secretary!

  2. Daniel Glaze said »

    I was fascinated to read this blog post, Dr. G. I have begun my third year of ministry at FBC Ahoskie, NC and I’ve been intent on communicating that we can be a “model church” for others in our area. That doesn’t mean we have it all together, but rather that we can name specific things that we feel we do well (intentionality in worship, for one). Though it’s not the exact same as the Hawthorne experiment, it’s nonetheless amazing to see dedication to and improvement of tasks, goals, etc. if and when we know that eyes (and expectations) are upon us. By the way, this speaks volumes to me as a parent as well.

    Could we consider the opposite of the Hawthorne effect the “null expectancy factor” (I think that’s what you called it)?

  3. Dr. G said »

    Daniel, great insight in plotting the Null-expectancy Factor as the opposite of the Hawthorne effect! I hadn’t thought of that. And yes, parents will set the tone of their children.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.